« アンダーハンドキャストの本質的な理論が判らない??フライフィッシングの落陽(2) | トップページ | 今年の中禅寺湖で活躍したキールフライ »

2016年11月 3日 (木)

I do not know the theory of underhand cast(Scandinavian style).Decline of fly fishing(2)

2 years and a half have passed since I began Spey cast.   
I don't understand theory of an underhand cast(Scandinavian style) well yet.   
Why isn't it understood? I'd like to include and explain a fable.

 

"Part 1 :  traditional Spey"   
Mercedes-Benz invented a car.   
4 people can take the car comfortably and you can move at high speed.   
Moreover it's possible to put the baggage in a trunk and carry together.   
Spey cast was born at the river called Spey River before.   
The invention makes around the point of a fly line an anchor.   
And the roll cast of which a D loop was composed.   
It's also possible to make the cast a backspace at the place where I have no time or money to spare by this invention.   
A cast with an angle change will be easily, and fishing of a down rise crossing has evolved.   
I salute and thank the great man that was developed and invented this first (predecessors).   
This theory is a simple easy to understand.   
[Main invention and theory] roll cast with the angle change of which a D loop was composed   
   

 

"Part 2:  Skagit cast"      
Toyota invented Hybrid car.   
Hybrid car loads an electric motor and the new drive system which used a burning engine.   
Hybrid car can get powerful acceleration by the strong torque of the electric motor.   
Moreover improvement of the substantial mileage could also be compatible.   
It is a little before the story, Skagit cast was invented in the river of Skagit.   
Skagit cast is to say that the water bone, makes use of the surface tension of the fly line and the water.   
This Skagit cast is while applying a load to the rod, you can cast.   
This theory is to use a vector of circular motion, because you can to remain bending the rod.   
Skagit cast was freed from a stop by movement (two-dimensional movement) and a concept as a drift at conventional time.   
Continue Motion it's difficult for Tailing to go out to a beginner where can do Skagit cast.   
We assumed that the cast to which big power is drawn out from a small D loop was possible by high efficiency.   
I thank the great person who developed and invented this (pioneer: main member and Mr ed.word).   
Skagit cast is very rational, and theory is made formal and it's easy to understand.   
Acquisition is easy compared with other Spey casts, and Skagit cast will recommend you as the Spey cast begun first.   
(The fault makes the front surface of the water make noise.)   
[Main invention and theory]it's possible while bending a rod by using a vector of circular motion.   
   

 

"Part 3 : underhand cast"   
The maker which says Suzuki made a compact car as a minicar.   
The minicar is small, but 4 people can take it, and you can also invade without pain at a small lane.   
Even if a minicar can park easily, and is small, high-speed running certain degree of is possible and also has the low fuel consumption.   
But is this invention?   
One kind of application technology to which I say that it becomes more compact.   
Now, the following word was changed and seen about movement of an underhand cast.   
lift  <---> lift   
Body turn  <---> it's dip?   
Half circul <---> sweep   
Leader touch  <---> anchor   
back stop <---> launch position   
What is different from traditional Spey?   
Will it be theory and invention by changing a word?   
After all just movement (the type and the means) comes, and the upper word is impossible by theory.   
The core of the underhand cast is in the vertical rotation of the rod using the left(Reverse) hand.   
However, originally, fly cast is only three kinds of "rotation", "stroke (parallel movement)," "rotation and stroke."   
I think of this as basic action from invention at first of a fry cast (concept of existence).   
An underhand cast seems in the roll cast for which compact rotation energy was used like "buttock" and "one-arm shoulder throw" of judo.   
If you dare to express the underhand cast worthy to be called "compact Spay" and "Little Spay".   
It's admitted that an underhand cast is technical one kind, but do theory and invention exist?   
I want someone to tell me by all means.   
I say many times, but the style and movement are the just means and aren't theory.   
Theory is what kind of physical development is used and what kind of effect I can get.   
I say the one a language could systematize.   
When a boundary is ambiguous and you can't become a language, I think that's only just technique (the trick).   
Moreover even if a process of movement and a way of an underhand cast are task-ized, that can be called theory, and I don't have that.   
Uchimura player of a gold medalist of an exercise has various application work.   
It's possible to change the each procedure for a language.   
But I think it's possible to copy his miracle (technique) for no one.   
Even if it's changed for a language, so it doesn't make the sense so much and he isn't calling his work theory.   
Everyone can copy 2 of theory above-mentioned and invention (traditional Spey and Skagit cast).   
2 of theory above-mentioned and invention (traditional Spey and Skagit cast) can mass-produce good poorness as difference.   
Because it's theory, it's natural.   
Perhaps an instructor was saying that an underhand cast could never be copied.   
In other words, I think this is the evidence that it's admitted not theory, but that it's high technique personally.   
Or theory of an underhand cast is a company secret, outside the gate, non-, going out be?   
Anyway everyone is good, so I want you to tell me the theory called an underhand cast.   
By the way, is a (miracle) demonstration of following LOOP (Stefan) an underhand cast?   
When it's an underhand cast, what is a threshold of distinction where why?   
By all means, I also want you to tell this to me.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0ZJhum4_Q4   
   
In the long run when we assume that "business" is a response, I also feel sorry for a beginner too much.   
After all a beginner can't even understand that a line is put on a rod and repulsive force is used.   
The revolving cast is too difficult for a beginner.   
I think itself has to change fly fishing industry into an act of folly in the declining current state.   
Because bad influence goes out to the whole industry by an act of folly.   
The thing which should be done now is easy to understand and simple, and that everyone is actual fighting possible by a little practice.   
Choose a cast, a rod and a line and classify it into "introductory course" "intermediate" "expert".   
But this should send the people in a footing who should be guided (professional).   
To be done to this, the great play that fly-fishing is disappears from the world.   
I find out that industry want to earn immediate small change, but since losing a basis of a business, there is also no origin so.   
Decline of fly-fishing is approaching to before one's eyes.   
   
written by Toshiyan

« アンダーハンドキャストの本質的な理論が判らない??フライフィッシングの落陽(2) | トップページ | 今年の中禅寺湖で活躍したキールフライ »

」カテゴリの記事

コメント

コメントを書く

コメントは記事投稿者が公開するまで表示されません。

(ウェブ上には掲載しません)

トラックバック

この記事のトラックバックURL:
http://app.cocolog-nifty.com/t/trackback/587227/64438760

この記事へのトラックバック一覧です: I do not know the theory of underhand cast(Scandinavian style).Decline of fly fishing(2):

« アンダーハンドキャストの本質的な理論が判らない??フライフィッシングの落陽(2) | トップページ | 今年の中禅寺湖で活躍したキールフライ »